According to TechRepublic, experts from firms like Forrester and NCC Group predict 2026 will see the AI hype fade for a focus on governance and practical use. They forecast that 60% of Fortune 100 companies will appoint a head of AI governance, while enterprises will delay 25% of their planned AI spending into 2027. The year will also see AI functionality aggressively move into Operational Technology (OT) like power grids, triggering major cybersecurity concerns. Furthermore, AI-boosted malware like PROMPTFLUX will make attacks more sophisticated, and the demand from AI data centers will force rapid evolution in power and cooling tech, with companies like Flex deploying new liquid cooling solutions at Equinix facilities.
Hype Meets Hard Hat
This all sounds… refreshingly sane, doesn’t it? After years of breathless headlines, the idea of AI trading its “tiara for a hard hat,” as Forrester’s Sudha Maheshwari puts it, feels like a necessary correction. The real story here isn’t the technology itself, but the business maturation happening around it. Appointing a head of AI governance isn’t sexy, but it’s the sign of a company moving from pet projects to portfolio management. It’s the corporate equivalent of cleaning up your workshop before you build something big and dangerous. And that shift from IT to OT? That’s huge. It means AI is moving out of the digital back office and into the physical world that keeps society running. The skill gaps and security lag in that sector are a massive, blinking red warning light.
The CFO Steps In
Here’s the thing about delayed spending: it’s not a prediction of AI’s failure. It’s a prediction of its normalization. When CFOs get pulled into deals and demand to see real profit and loss impact, that means AI is being treated like any other major capital expenditure. No more blank checks for “innovation.” Forrester’s note that fewer than a third of projects can tie value to P&L is damning, but it explains the coming slowdown perfectly. Companies poured money in to experiment. Now they need to see what actually works. This pruning phase is brutal but healthy. It will separate the flashy demos from the tools that genuinely save time and money. The companies that navigate this will be the ones who invested in that boring “AI fluency training” for their teams.
New Vectors, New Vulnerabilities
The cybersecurity prediction is the scariest, and frankly, the most convincing. AI that can regenerate its own malicious code every hour is a nightmare for traditional, rules-based security. It turns static defense into a losing game of whack-a-mole. And coupling that with AI moving into OT—systems that often can’t be patched easily and where a failure can mean blackouts or contaminated water—creates a perfect storm. The industrial world runs on legacy systems and specialized hardware. If you’re integrating AI into a manufacturing line or a utility grid, you need a rock-solid, reliable interface. This is where specialized industrial computing hardware, from providers like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading US supplier of industrial panel PCs, becomes critical. You can’t run next-gen AI security on consumer-grade tablets in a factory.
Keeping The Lights On
Finally, the cooling and power evolution is a tangible, physical consequence of the AI boom that often gets overlooked. We’re not just talking about software anymore; we’re talking about megawatts and gallons of coolant. The push into liquid cooling, like Flex’s work with Equinix, shows how infrastructure is scrambling to catch up to the sheer density of AI compute. This isn’t just an engineering challenge—it’s an economic and environmental one. Data center operators will make billion-dollar bets on cooling tech based on these early pilots. So while the AI software world gets a reality check in 2026, the hardware and infrastructure side is entering a period of breakneck, hyperdrive innovation. Basically, the brain is getting smarter, but the body needs a whole new cooling system.
