According to Forbes, artificial intelligence is no longer just a background process but is now acting, deciding and interacting in ways that blur the line between software and staff. Ric Smith, president of product and technology at Okta, emphasized that AI represents “a new element to help protect our customers from which is the proliferation of these agents” that should be treated as users rather than tools. Security expert Den Jones, founder and CEO of 909Cyber, reinforced this perspective, noting that “the moment an AI system can log in, pull data, or take action, it’s part of your identity fabric — whether you’ve acknowledged it or not.” The analysis reveals that most organizations still treat AI as infrastructure rather than applying the same governance, visibility and behavioral controls used for human employees, creating significant security vulnerabilities that operate at machine speed.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The $4 Trillion Identity Governance Gap
The shift toward treating AI as users rather than tools represents one of the largest untapped market opportunities in enterprise technology. Traditional identity and access management (IAM) solutions were built for human-scale operations, with provisioning cycles measured in days or weeks and behavioral monitoring designed around human work patterns. AI agents operate at machine speed, making thousands of API calls per minute and potentially accessing sensitive data across multiple systems simultaneously. This creates a fundamental mismatch between existing security controls and the reality of AI-powered workflows. Companies that fail to adapt their IAM strategies will face not only security risks but also compliance nightmares under regulations like GDPR and CCPA, where AI-driven data processing without proper governance could trigger massive penalties.
Winners and Losers in the AI Identity Race
The cybersecurity vendor landscape is about to undergo a seismic shift. Established IAM providers like Okta, Microsoft, and Ping Identity face both enormous opportunity and existential threat. Those who can quickly adapt their platforms to handle non-human identities at scale will capture a massive new market segment. However, we’re already seeing specialized startups emerging that focus exclusively on machine identity management, and they could disrupt the incumbents by building solutions specifically for the AI era. The traditional approach of using service accounts and API keys with indefinite lifespans is fundamentally broken when applied to AI systems. Vendors that can provide dynamic, context-aware access controls with real-time behavioral monitoring will dominate the next decade of enterprise security spending.
The Compliance Nightmare Ahead
Regulatory bodies worldwide are scrambling to catch up with AI governance, but most current frameworks still treat AI as a tool rather than an actor. This creates a dangerous gap where companies might technically comply with existing regulations while creating massive unseen risks. For example, under GDPR’s “right to explanation,” if an AI agent makes an automated decision affecting user data, companies must be able to explain how that decision was made. But if the AI is operating with poorly managed credentials and unclear access boundaries, establishing audit trails becomes nearly impossible. We’re likely to see the first major regulatory actions against companies for AI governance failures within the next 12-18 months, which will force the entire industry to accelerate their identity management strategies for non-human users.
The Enterprise Adoption Dilemma
Forward-thinking enterprises are already recognizing that their AI adoption strategies need fundamental rethinking. The most sophisticated organizations are creating new roles like “AI Identity Architect” and establishing governance frameworks that treat AI systems as virtual employees with clearly defined responsibilities, access levels, and monitoring requirements. However, the majority of companies are stuck in a dangerous middle ground—they’ve deployed AI agents throughout their organizations but continue using human-centric security models. This creates what security professionals call “shadow AI”—autonomous systems operating without proper oversight. The companies that solve this governance challenge first will gain significant competitive advantage, both in security posture and in their ability to safely leverage AI for business transformation.
The Road to AI Accountability
Looking ahead, we’re moving toward a future where every AI agent will have its own digital identity with attributes similar to human employees: role-based access, behavioral baselines, activity monitoring, and automated offboarding procedures. The identity governance market, currently valued at around $12 billion, could easily triple in size as organizations retrofit their security frameworks to accommodate non-human users. The most successful security vendors will be those that can provide unified visibility across both human and machine identities while maintaining the flexibility to handle the unique characteristics of AI systems. Companies that delay addressing this challenge will find themselves vulnerable to both security breaches and competitive displacement as more agile organizations leverage properly governed AI to accelerate innovation.
