According to Forbes, an analysis of over 12,000 workplace evaluations revealed that both male and female raters consistently rated female leaders slightly higher on overall leadership effectiveness than their male counterparts. The research specifically examined 360-degree feedback from managers across the US, Canada, Europe, South America, and Asia, with 95% of raters holding management positions themselves. Female leaders were rated significantly higher on seven key behaviors including taking initiative, practicing self-development, and displaying integrity, with both male and female raters recognizing these same strengths. The study deliberately selected only raters who had evaluated both male and female leaders to ensure comparable data, and even in peer-to-peer evaluations where competition runs highest, the pattern held with minimal gender bias. This research provides crucial insights into how real workplace relationships can override unconscious biases that persist in abstract evaluations.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Proximity Principle in Action
What makes this research particularly compelling is how it challenges traditional approaches to diversity training. Many organizations invest heavily in unconscious bias training that focuses on abstract concepts and hypothetical scenarios, yet this data suggests the most powerful antidote to bias may be structural rather than educational. When companies create environments where people from different backgrounds work closely together on meaningful projects, the abstract categories of gender, race, or other demographic factors naturally recede in importance. This has significant implications for how companies allocate their diversity and inclusion budgets—perhaps shifting resources from classroom training to designing collaborative workspaces, cross-functional teams, and project-based work that naturally brings diverse employees into regular contact.
Competitive Advantage Through Authentic Inclusion
Organizations that successfully implement this “proximity principle” may gain substantial competitive advantages in talent acquisition and retention. The research indicates that once women are in leadership roles and working alongside colleagues, they’re evaluated fairly—even favorably—on their actual performance. This suggests that companies focusing on getting diverse talent into visible roles where their work can speak for itself will likely outperform competitors who remain stuck in abstract diversity initiatives. The market impact could be significant: companies that crack this code will attract top female talent who see genuine opportunities for fair evaluation and advancement, while also benefiting from the specific leadership strengths the research identifies women as excelling in, such as inspiring teams and driving organizational change.
The Gap Between Theory and Practice
Despite these encouraging findings, significant implementation challenges remain. The research highlights that bias still exists in initial hiring processes, resume screening, and first impressions—meaning women must first overcome barriers to enter leadership roles before their actual performance can counter stereotypes. This creates a “first mile” problem where organizations might become complacent, assuming that once women are in roles, bias will naturally disappear. The reality is more complex: companies need to address both the initial barriers to entry and the structural conditions that enable proximity to work its magic. This requires careful attention to recruitment practices, promotion pathways, and organizational design—all areas where many companies still struggle despite good intentions.
Redefining Leadership Development
Perhaps the most profound implication concerns how we conceptualize leadership development itself. The research shows women excel in certain competencies while men show strength in others, suggesting that the most effective organizations will be those that value diverse leadership styles rather than trying to fit everyone into a single mold. This could drive a fundamental shift in leadership training programs, performance management systems, and succession planning. Instead of seeking homogeneous leadership profiles, forward-thinking companies will deliberately cultivate complementary strengths across their leadership teams, creating more resilient and adaptable organizations. The market will likely reward companies that embrace this nuanced approach to leadership development with better decision-making, more innovative solutions, and stronger organizational performance.
