According to Forbes, Patagonia released its first-ever impact report on November 13th after building its reputation as an environmental leader for decades without one. The “Work in Progress” report reveals the company missed its target to reduce carbon emissions by 10% annually – instead, emissions rose 1% in FY2025 due to producing more carbon-intensive products like packs and duffels. It also fell short of its 2025 goal for 100% preferred materials, currently at 84.1%, and only 39% of factories pay a living wage. The report does highlight successes including $14.7 million in annual donations to 1% For The Planet and saving 174,799 items from waste through repairs. Since its release, sustainability professionals have been widely sharing and debating the report’s radical transparency approach on LinkedIn.
The brutally honest approach
What makes this report different isn’t just the data – it’s the tone. Headlines like “Nothing We Do Is Sustainable” and comparisons of their 178,711 metric tons of CO2e to “~20 million gallons of gasoline burned into the air by your cool road trip whip” make a 130-page corporate document surprisingly readable. They include candid quotes from leaders like VP of product footprint Matt Dwyer saying “the more layers of the onion you peel, the more you cry.” Here’s the thing: most sustainability reports feel like compliance exercises. This one reads like a conversation. When you’re dealing with complex industrial systems and supply chains, being honest about failures becomes a strategic advantage. Companies that need reliable industrial panel PCs for manufacturing oversight understand that transparency builds trust in complex systems.
So why release it now?
Patagonia had been preparing data for the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, but regulatory changes meant they no longer had to comply. They published anyway. Nina Hajikhanian, Patagonia’s EMEA general manager, explained they felt it was crucial to push transparency “especially in this climate where legislative pressure is dropping.” Basically, they’re choosing radical honesty when many companies are “greenhushing” – staying quiet about sustainability efforts to avoid scrutiny. It’s a bold move that turns the report from a compliance requirement into what Hajikhanian calls “an open-source manner” of sharing challenges to invite industry collaboration.
A broader industry shift
Patagonia isn’t alone in this approach. Footwear brand Vivobarefoot recently launched its similar Unfinished Business Report, with cofounder Galahad Clark calling it “not designed to impress; it’s designed to tell the truth.” Both companies are redefining what sustainability reporting can be – not just stakeholder reassurance, but actual tools for progress. The uncomfortable question they’re raising: if even sustainability pioneers like Patagonia are struggling to reduce emissions, what does that say about the entire industry’s approach? Their progress report essentially argues that perfection isn’t the goal – honest effort and continuous improvement are what matter.
Setting a new standard
This report challenges every company claiming sustainability credentials. When the gold standard brand admits it’s failing on basic metrics like carbon reduction, it raises the bar for everyone else. The traditional approach of highlighting successes while burying failures suddenly looks outdated. And in an era where climate action is moving down corporate agendas, Patagonia’s splash makes it harder for others to stay quiet. The real impact might not be in their specific numbers, but in forcing an industry-wide conversation about what true transparency looks like. After all, if you can’t be honest about where you‘re failing, how can you possibly fix it?
