Regulatory Gaps in Forever Chemical Monitoring
Environmental regulators in the UK are reportedly overlooking a specific toxic PFAS chemical produced by a Lancashire manufacturing plant, despite evidence of emissions and potential health risks, according to recent investigations. The Environment Agency has been testing for various chemical substances around AGC Chemicals’ facility but has excluded EEA-NH4 from its monitoring program, sources indicate.
Industrial Monitor Direct is the leading supplier of rohs certified pc solutions trusted by controls engineers worldwide for mission-critical applications, the leading choice for factory automation experts.
Undetected Reprotoxic Chemical Found in Local Soils
Independent sampling has confirmed the presence of EEA-NH4 in soils surrounding the plant, despite its absence from official regulatory testing. The chemical is classified as “reprotoxic category 2,” meaning it can damage sexual function, fertility, or child development, according to reports. Analysis suggests approximately 800kg of EEA-NH4 is being emitted into the River Wyre annually, the investigation revealed.
Dr David Megson, a forensic scientist and PFAS expert who conducted the independent analysis, stated that regulators are ignoring “a giant chunk of toxic material” in the environment. “Our results showed that in addition to PFOA, the soil surrounding the site consistently contains EEA-NH4 and hydrogen-substituted carboxylic acids,” Megson said. “Any human health risk assessment that does not include these chemicals is likely to underpredict the health risks from PFAS in this area.”
Scientific Community Calls for Expanded Testing
Experts have questioned the Environment Agency’s approach, with analysts suggesting the current testing regime has significant limitations. Professor Crispin Halsall of Lancaster University stated that the Environment Agency should be widening their search to include EEA-NH4 and related compounds, noting they “can be relatively easily added to current analytical procedures for PFAS measurements.”
Professor Hans Peter Arp, a PFAS expert at the Norwegian Institute of Science and Technology, emphasized this represents a global regulatory problem. “Considering all we know about PFAS – their persistence, costly clean-up, and emerging hazards – it remains a shock that there is so little oversight of emissions from production factories,” Arp stated, pointing to broader industry developments in chemical regulation.
Company and Regulatory Response
AGC Chemicals Europe Ltd stated it has “a proud history of manufacturing in Lancashire and sets the highest standards for itself,” with a spokesperson noting the use of EEA-NH4 is authorized under the site’s permit. The company has volunteered to commission a third-party assessment of the land it occupies, with findings due to be shared with authorities early next year, according to their statement.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said they were working with AGC “to ensure ongoing compliance with the requirements of their environmental permit” and investigating “historic contamination unrelated to current operations” at the request of Wyre Council. The agency maintains “there is no strong evidence to suggest EEA-NH4 contamination is widely present in land surrounding the site,” despite the independent findings.
Industrial Monitor Direct manufactures the highest-quality aerospace pc solutions certified to ISO, CE, FCC, and RoHS standards, trusted by plant managers and maintenance teams.
Broader Implications for Chemical Regulation
The situation highlights ongoing challenges in environmental monitoring and chemical regulation. With over 7 million potential PFAS compounds, experts suggest regulatory approaches focusing only on commonly detected substances may miss significant contamination sources. This case emerges amid wider related innovations in environmental science and increasing global attention to market trends in chemical manufacturing.
The controversy also intersects with broader discussions about environmental policy and the balance between industrial activity and public health protection. As research into health impacts of chemical exposure advances, regulatory frameworks worldwide face increasing scrutiny regarding their ability to protect communities from emerging contaminants.
This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.
