According to Fortune, IBM Senior Vice President Ana Paula Assis told the Global Forum in Riyadh that AI’s true potential requires transforming business models through “a systemic approach” that integrates silos and moves beyond isolated pilots. IBM research shows two-thirds of EMEA leaders already see positive AI productivity impacts, but a MIT Media Lab study found 95% of organizations aren’t seeing clear ROI due to a “learning gap” in implementation. This disconnect reveals a fundamental challenge facing enterprises today.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Systemic Implementation Challenge
The core issue stems from treating artificial intelligence as just another technology tool rather than a transformative capability that requires rethinking entire operational structures. Traditional business models built around departmental silos and linear processes fundamentally conflict with AI’s potential for cross-functional optimization. When companies deploy AI within existing frameworks, they’re essentially trying to fit a square peg in a round hole – the technology might work technically but fails to deliver strategic value because the underlying operational model remains unchanged. This explains why only 1% of corporate data is currently being utilized for AI applications despite massive investments in the technology itself.
Critical Analysis of Implementation Risks
The most significant risk isn’t technological failure but organizational resistance to the fundamental changes required for AI success. Companies face substantial productivity paradoxes where initial AI investments may actually decrease efficiency as teams struggle with new workflows and integration challenges. The “learning gap” mentioned in research reflects deeper issues around change management and skills development that many organizations underestimate. Furthermore, the emphasis on data readiness highlights a critical vulnerability – companies with fragmented data governance or legacy systems face exponentially higher implementation barriers that can’t be solved by simply purchasing more AI tools. The orchestration capabilities Assis mentions require sophisticated governance frameworks that many organizations lack entirely.
Industry Impact and Competitive Landscape
We’re witnessing the emergence of a new competitive divide between companies that successfully transform their business models and those that merely layer AI onto existing structures. The regional variations in adoption success, particularly the 84% positive impact reported in Saudi Arabia, suggest that organizations in growth markets may have advantages in implementing systemic changes due to less entrenched legacy systems. This creates potential for market disruption as newer players leverage AI-native business models against established competitors burdened by technical debt. The partnership ecosystem Assis describes is becoming increasingly crucial, with solution providers like IBM and others competing to offer the orchestration platforms needed for successful enterprise-scale AI implementation.
Realistic Outlook and Predictions
The journey toward meaningful AI ROI will be longer and more complex than many executives anticipate. We’re likely to see a consolidation phase where companies that rushed into AI without proper business transformation strategies pull back investments, while organizations that successfully integrate AI across their operations will achieve compounding advantages. The doubling of AI workflow adoption since 2023 indicates momentum, but the high percentage of organizations not seeing ROI suggests we’re still in the early experimental phase. Success will require not just technological implementation but fundamental rethinking of how value is created and delivered – a transformation that typically takes years rather than quarters to achieve meaningful results.
