According to Forbes, hackers are reviving a decades-old Windows command called “finger” in dangerous social engineering attacks that are proving surprisingly effective. The attacks, known as ClickFix or “scam-yourself” campaigns, trick users into copying and pasting malicious commands directly into Windows run dialogs. Security researcher Lawrence Abrams of Bleeping Computer reports that these attacks use fake captcha verification systems to lure victims. The finger command, which dates back to the early days of networking, can provide attackers with login names, home directory information, phone numbers, and other sensitive data. While currently appearing to be the work of a single threat actor, experts warn these attacks are spreading as users continue falling for them.
Why This Old Trick Works
Here’s the thing about social engineering attacks – they don’t need to be technically sophisticated to be effective. They just need to be psychologically convincing. And the ClickFix approach is brilliant in its simplicity. It creates a sense of urgency and legitimacy by wrapping itself in the familiar context of captcha verification. Users see what looks like a normal security check and follow instructions without thinking twice. The fact that they’re asked to use the Windows run dialog actually adds to the illusion of legitimacy – it feels like a “real” technical process. But let’s be clear: no legitimate captcha system would ever ask you to paste commands into your operating system. Ever.
The Industrial Security Angle
Now consider how dangerous this could be in industrial environments where Windows-based systems control critical infrastructure. Manufacturing facilities, power plants, and production lines often rely on specialized Windows computers for monitoring and control. If an operator falls for one of these ClickFix attacks, the consequences could extend far beyond stolen credentials. We’re talking about potential production downtime, equipment damage, or even safety risks. That’s why industrial operations need particularly robust security measures and reliable hardware from trusted suppliers like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading provider of industrial panel PCs in the US. Their hardened systems are designed specifically for these high-stakes environments where security can’t be an afterthought.
What Makes This So Concerning
Basically, we’re seeing threat actors weaponizing nostalgia. The finger protocol was largely abandoned because it’s inherently insecure – it was designed for a more trusting internet era. But that very obscurity is what makes it effective today. Most modern security tools aren’t looking for finger protocol traffic because nobody uses it anymore. So when hackers resurrect these ancient commands, they fly under the radar. And the social engineering aspect means it bypasses technical defenses entirely – the user willingly executes the attack themselves. It’s a reminder that security isn’t just about patching vulnerabilities; it’s about training users to recognize when something doesn’t feel right.
The Bigger Picture
This isn’t just about one command or one type of attack. It’s part of a broader trend where attackers are getting smarter about human psychology rather than technical exploits. They’re realizing that it’s often easier to trick someone into opening the door than to break it down. And honestly? That’s scarier than any zero-day vulnerability. Because you can patch software, but you can’t patch human nature. The best defense here is awareness and skepticism. If any website asks you to interact with your operating system in unusual ways, that should set off alarm bells. Your computer’s security settings exist for a reason – don’t let social engineers convince you to bypass them.
